The businesses referred to as ‘Courts’ are not longer acting independently or even acting solely under the Crown in right, but rather are run by stakeholders that influence decision making processes and outcomes critical to the “success” of the Court, as stated by the “MAGISTRATES COURT OF VICTORIA” in public document.
Straight from the ‘horse’s mouth’.
See document
download here
https://corpau.blogspot.com/2022/05/more-to-come-soon.html
sharing the discovered below – information City Councils and Rates are Illegal
In previous posts corpau has mentioned that local city councils and their charging of rates is unlawful.
In order to fully and lawfully explain this, one post, a few paragraphs or even a couple of dozen paragraphs will not be enough, as the information pertaining to this subject also calls on Australia’s Constitution, it’s validity, the Magna Carta, Royal Assent and Common Law, which prevails over all others, i.e. government and corporate.
The police swear an oath to the Queen to carry out the orders pertaining to this oath, and are NOT allowed to act in or on behalf of corporations which they factually do so, even now ‘enforcing’ unlawful city council fines.
If the peasants revolt or produce factually legal documentation, they are met with the police ‘force’ and removed even while presenting their case peacefully.
The police have the task to keep the masses in line for the establishment, that is their primary role, and NOT to fight crime as perceived by the general populous.
The police and legal system lets the criminals out onto the streets to offend and re-offend, and to murder the ‘canon fodder’.
Many people are disillusioned with how ‘unfair’ or how biased the legal system is, but the fact remains that Australia’s Westminster ‘Anglo-Masonic’ legal system is for the sole benefit of corporations and their brethren members, at the expense of the general populous and the tax payers.
A video posted on youtube Pirates of the Suburbs – Destroying Communities (55min) by Rena Iliades posted on 31 Dec 2012 documents such fraud, among other sources.
The shire where the expose begins is local to the poster, that being Melton City Council.
The Melton City Council / Shire of Melton / SHIRE OF MELTON has also the registered business name of Summersault with the ABN of 22 862 073 889.
Other ‘councils’ in the vicinity are HUME CITY COUNCIL ABN: 14 854 354 856, or MORELAND CITY COUNCIL with the ABN: 46 202 010 737.
ABN (Australian Business Number) / ACN (Australian Company Number) are numbers that relate to businesses/companies, corporations and NOT government institutions.
A referendum in 1974 AND 1988 produced results that the majority of people did not want local councils, but yet they still exist to this day, charging rates, ‘fining’ people and foreclosing on their homes, throwing them out onto the streets.
Just to perpetuate the fraud, some city councils change their names every few years, so that monies fraudulently taken cannot be recovered.
The corporate media is subservient to the authorities, as well as having the job not to incite the masses. While there may be exposures of government fraud, there is very little action done on this.
While there is a little bit of news that suggests that councils are illegal and fraudulent there is little follow up action that vindicates the plebs.
The police (including sheriffs) knowingly carry out unlawful breaking and entering, do not ‘serve’ as they are supposed ALL with the support of the legal system behind them, the key being here to keep the masses in their place.
The extent of this ‘city council’ rates fraud across Australia is worth billions annually to the general populous, where the authorities are vigorous at protecting their crimes.
Supporting docs and evidence of law here
Supporting Docs here for download as well as formatted pdf of the public notice
https://redpill101.wordpress.com/matter-of-public-interest-shire-councils-rates-unlawful-and-abolished/
https://redpill101.wordpress.com/
The below is a section of the 9 page document. The law is stated in original language in the doc and it is all cited.
Matter of public Interest
To the People of the Commonwealth of Australia.
WE received a GIFT
The Crown of England relieved ALL the Commonwealth from the oppressive burden of land rates, taxes, fees and more!
We do not have to argue this right.
Stare Decisi
(The decision Stands)
The Feudal Doctrine was Abolished in 1660, Centuries Ago.
“LET US NOT EVER FORGET AGAIN”
In the 1999 referendum WE the People of the Commonwealth of Australia voted to remain united in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the II of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland under the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia.
Any law, statute, reservation or seal that breaches the Crown’s relationship with the people of the Commonwealth of Australia are utterly null and void. Including the Australia Act 1986.
1660 the Restoration of the Crown of England
and the ABOLISHMENT of the Feudal Doctrine
A STATUE OF THE REALM
assented to by King Charles II under the Royal Seal of England
The Crown ABOLISHED land taxes, land rates, fees, charges, levies, on land you own. FOREVER AND EVER.
The Crown ABOLISHED the administration of the wards and liveries responsible for collecting these taxes, rules, regulations governing land and the court responsible for fines, seizing property for non payment. Both were ABOLISHED FOREVER AND EVER.
ALL LAND was converted into one and one only FREE AND COMMON SOCCAGE. FOREVER AND EVER. (private, farming, commercial)
No law, act, statute, reservation can change or challenge FOREVER AND EVER. 07 June, 2015 15:50
https://redpill101.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/abolition_star_chamber_1641.doc
Foreign body corporate owns Reserve Bank, lends money to the Commonwealth at interest
by Kev Moore
The RBA and the ATO are owned by the owners of the corporation called “The Commonwealth of Australia”, registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
“The Reserve Bank is a foreign ADI. A “foreign ADI” means a body corporate that:
(a) is a foreign corporation within the meaning of paragraph 51(xx) of the Constitution; and
(b) is authorised to carry on banking business in a foreign country; and
(c) has been granted an authority under section 9 to carry on banking business in Australia”.
Therefore under section 44 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act no person on being elected is eligible to sit in parliament as they are subject to a foreign power
Statute Law is Maritime or the Pirates of Finance law
Rabbi Reichhorn’s Protocols
“6. By the ceaseless praise of DEMOCRATIC RULE we shall divide the Christians into political parties, we shall destroy the unity of their nations, we shall sow discord everywhere. Reduced to impotence, they will bow before the LAW of OUR BANK, always united, and always devoted to our Cause.”
Section 44: Disqualification
Any person who:
is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power; or
is attainted of treason, or has been convicted and is under sentence, or subject to be sentenced, for any offence punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State by imprisonment for one year or longer; or
is an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent; or
holds any office of profit under the Crown, or any pension payable during the pleasure of the Crown out of any of the revenues of the Commonwealth: or
has any direct or indirect pecuniary interest in any agreement with the Public Service of the Commonwealth otherwise than as a member and in common with the other members of an incorporated company consisting of more than twenty-five persons;
shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.
“It is illegal for an Australian company to hire a foreign official as its paid agent.” — The Reserve Bank of Australia and the Australian constitution
The Reserve Bank is a foreign ADI. A “foreign ADI” means a body corporate that:
(a) is a foreign corporation within the meaning of paragraph 51(xx) of the Constitution; and
(b) is authorised to carry on banking business in a foreign country; and
(c) has been granted an authority under section 9 to carry on banking business in Australia.
Prior to 1959 the Commonwealth issued and printed its own money and had control of the printing of money. However after the 1959 Reserve Bank Act, the Reserve Bank was established as a stand alone independent foreign ADI, which took over the printing of money and lent the money it printed to the Commonwealth at interest. So instead of the Commonwealth printing its own money, we have a foreign body corporate printing our money and lending it to the Commonwealth which the Commonwealth needs to pay back!
“RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 – SECT 77
Guarantee by Commonwealth
The Commonwealth is responsible for the payment of all moneys due by the Bank” (The commonwealth of Australia is paying money it borrows back to the stand alone bank)
(Source: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/ … 0/s77.html)
“RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 – SECT 27
Bank to be banker for Commonwealth
The Bank shall, in so far as the Commonwealth requires it to do so, act as banker and financial agent of the Commonwealth” (The reserve bank is the Commonwealths banker and lender and the Commonwealth must pay the money back to the Bank!)
(Source: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/ … 0/s27.html)
EVIDENCE THE BANK IS A FOREIGN ADI WITH FOREIGN LINKS AND BRANCHES:
The below act shows how foreign corporations have power of attorney over the Reserve Bank of Australia:
RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 – SECT 76
Attorney of Bank
The Bank may, by instrument under its seal, appoint a person (whether in Australia or in a place beyond Australia) to be its attorney and a person so appointed may, subject to the instrument, do any act or execute any power or function which he or she is authorized by the instrument to do or execute. (Source: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/ … 0/s76.html)
Foreign Agents in control of the Reserve Bank of Australia:
RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 – SECT 75
Agents etc.
In the exercise of its powers and the performance of its functions, the Bank may:
(a) establish branches and agencies at such places, whether within or beyond Australia, as the Bank thinks fit;
(b) arrange with a person to act as agent of the Bank in any place, whether within or beyond Australia; and
(c) act as the agent of an ADI carrying on business within or beyond Australia.
Letter to ADIs: Operation of foreign banks in Australia
Under the Banking Act 1959, foreign banks are required to be licensed by APRA as authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) in order to conduct banking business in Australia. APRA also authorises representative offices for foreign banks that otherwise wish to maintain a permanent establishment in Australia. Representative offices are generally granted an exemption under Section 66 of the Banking Act in order to use the restricted term ‘bank’ in connection with their activity in Australia. However, they must limit their activities to those prescribed by APRA for representative offices.1
Over time, reflecting the global nature of banking business and the centralisation of many functions, foreign banks operating in Australia as branches have conducted some aspects of their local operations from offshore or outside the branch. In general, APRA does not have a fundamental concern with these types of operational structures but notes that they have the potential to lessen APRA’s ability to provide effective prudential supervision of the local operations.
Recently, APRA has received a number of proposals from foreign banks wishing to conduct activities with Australian customers from their offshore offices. As a result, APRA is issuing this letter to clarify its policy expectations with respect to business conducted in Australia, or with Australian customers, by foreign banks.
Consistent with the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s principles on home-host country supervision, APRA has generally taken the position that foreign banks soliciting and operating an active business in Australia should be subject to Australian prudential regulation and supervision, regardless of where the business is booked. However, APRA would not object to a foreign bank conducting business with Australian counterparties from its offshore offices provided:
•the foreign bank does not maintain an office or permanent staff in Australia, including staff employed by another entity within the banking group that conducts business on its behalf;
•the foreign bank is not soliciting business from retail customers in Australia;
•all business contracts and arrangements are clearly transacted and booked offshore, and are subject to an offshore legal and regulatory jurisdiction; and
•the foreign bank does not breach Section 66 of the Banking Act. APRA will not provide exemptions from Section 66 for foreign banks operating in Australia other than in conjunction with the limited activities of a representative office.
http://www.apra.gov.au/adi/Publications/Pages/Letter-to-ADIs-Operation-of-foreign-bank
“““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““`
Evil reigns over Australia the penal colony – seek justice wheret here is none,rotten to the core read on ~
Nelle's journey 