Date: May 26, 2024Author: Editor, cairnsnews 14 Comments
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
IN 2021, Scott Morrison’s Coalition government, fresh from carrying out the Australian side of the global Covid bioterrorism operation, kicked along another less obvious little global operation – the eSafety Bill, giving Australia’s eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant extended powers to shut down online child porn, “terrorist” and “hate” content.
According to Wikileaks, Inman Grant, after graduating from a US university in the early 1990s, was offered a position as a case agent with the CIA, but declined as it meant “I wouldn’t be able to tell my friends and family what I was doing”. It’s not every day that a random American girl is offered a spot on the CIA, so obviously our Julie had something special going for her.
Instead she took up another public sector job as a policy adviser for the late US Congressman John Miller, a Yale graduate and Republican from Washington state who had worked in an anti-human trafficking department in the US State Department.
From 1995 to 2000, Inman Grant worked as a government affairs manager for Microsoft then in 2000, moved to Australia to become head of corporate affairs at Microsoft until 2004. There’s no doubt that our gal Julie was a fast-rising corporate star, obviously with all the right connections, and not just good looks.
In 2005 she moved even higher, becoming Microsoft’s Asia-Pacific director of internet safety, privacy and security until 2009 when she progressed to global director for safety and privacy policy and outreach. Our girl Julie had surely reached the summit, no doubt sitting in the board room with the likes of Bill Gates and others.
But Inman Grant was not going to stop there. In 2014, she became director of public policy in Australia and south-east Asia at Twitter then in 2016 moved to the role of director of government relations in the Asia-Pacific region at Adobe. There was no stopping this go-getter extraordinaire. Those CIA guys really must have regretted not taking our Julie on board.
And sure enough, Adobe, a name in every PC, laptop and phone, wasn’t the end of the line for Julie because a prime spot on the Australian Public Service, or more accurately the Australian Special Executive Service as an eSafety Commissioner, came up in 2017. And who, might we ask would be better qualified?
Meanwhile, things were hotting up in the online world. In 2019 an Australian man prone to globe trotting and mercenary work, ended up in New Zealand with a “special job” in mind. He created global shock by going on a shooting spree against the Moslem community in the city of Christchurch and live-streamed the entire event. In a bizarre kind of way, this was fortuitous for eSafety Commissioner Inman Grant.
In the “public mind”, shocked by the terrorist event, controlling online content was an acceptable thing and after-all, New Zealand’s caring, sharing and compassionate PM Jacinda Ardern “quite rightly” made posting of the online content from that massacre a criminal offence.
Enter Scott Morrison and his Coalition government who came up with the idea of greater powers to target online child sexual abuse content. It was good politics for Morrison, as it would keep his conservative Christian backers at the Australian Christian Lobby and Family First happy.
So Morrison and his Canberra team touted a “world first scheme to tackle cyber bullying among adults” enforced by $555,000 fines. The adult entertainment industry freaked out, thinking Scotty and the Christians had worked out a scheme to send them out of business.
Inman Grant however, soon reassured the “adult entertainers” that they weren’t targets. Nor would gays, trannies and the rest of the LGBTQ+ spectrum. Only kiddie porn pushers would be targeted, which would seem to narrow her target down to pedos, as we are to believe they are entirely different to the others. Also targeted would be material that “incited, instructed or promoted terrorism or violent crime.”
So Inman Grant and her eSafety Commission could now give the global transgender movement a ready and real form of protection with real teeth. Sorry about that, Christians, and others who dared suggest that this is the same LGBTIQ+ lobby that is targeting children with pornographic content through the “progressive” education programs we see in the Labor states. These dissidents should know that it’s now dangerous for people to speak out against the LGBTQ+ spectrum in angry, derogatory terms.
So, some four years down the track from Morrison’s 2021 eSafety Bill, Inman Grant, is threatening an $800,000 fine against Elon Musk’s X platform for posting content by Canadian man Chris Elston, aka Billboard Chris, a campaigner against child mutilation and drugging in the name of “gender reassignment”. Elston’s “misgendering” comments were “deliberately degrading” of transvestite Teddy Cook, according to Inman Grant’s office.
X has since announced plans to pursue legal action against the Australian government in the name of free speech. Elston refused to remove his post, even after a judge ruled against him.
The eSafety Commissioner says it is “hate and vilification” to speak out against the idea that children struggling with emotional upset need to understand they may have been “misgendered” and should consider “transitioning”. Some Aussies think this is all very warped, but others would suggest that’s what happens to values in a cultural revolution.
Comments by Billboard Chris about the transgender lobby and what he calls the greatest medical scandal in history were picked up by transgender activists and conveyed to Inman Grant, who by this time is being mischievously labeled a censorship commissar. The eSafety office launched an immediate “hate speech” action against Musk and the Canadian, demanding the “offending words” be taken down.
X has also faced action by the Australian Muslim Advocacy Network (AMAN) who were allegedly offended by “a far-right conspiracy group posting a range of Islamophobic commentary about Muslims being ‘an existential threat’ to the world.”
The Moslems had earlier lodged a complaint with the Queensland Human Rights Commission. How dare any Australian insult a Moslem! As Inman Grant’s office will tell you, that’s “hate speech” aka “Islamophobia”, which apparently is something as sinful as “homophobia” or “transphopbia”.
Lawyers for X fought back but when the matter went to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal, it ruled in favour of AMAN. Some are suggesting that all of this is akin to George Orwell’s world of enforced Newspeak, the official Ingsoc language of Oceania.
Inman Grant and her eSafety Commission are not alone on the global stage. The aforesaid Ardern is up to her neck in “eSafety” censorship with her Christchurch Call organisation. In recent times there has developed an entire global network of eSafety offices taking action against wrong speech that offends the global narrative.
It must be hard for our Julie, seeing this entire thing degenerate into something we can only call a global censorship war. There’s even an Institute for Strategic Dialogue, to counter “climate disinformation”. Oh, how dare people think that the “climate science” is a cover for some “globalist” political agenda! Such subversive thoughts must be exposed and countered, an perhaps even made illegal.
Meanwhile, sarcasm aside, Wikileaks’ 2008 warning about potential political abuse of an anti-child porn site blacklist released in Denmark has come to fruition. An upstart Australian internet censorship commissar employing global information control to enforce cultural Marxist ideology, has led the way. Congratulations Ms Inman Grant. We’re sure you’ll go down in history, somehow.
How curious that this corporate “power lady” who came out of the highest ranks of US big tech should take up a job in the boring Australian public service while flouting totalitarian views around Davos. One might ask whether she really is some sort of CIA operative. After all the CIA is a major partner in Big Tech.
But maybe the CIA connection really is innocent, and she’s just another overpaid, “progressive” corporate narcissist, full of her own self-importance and drunk on the power given her by legislation? The way she flouts herself online also might lead one to that conclusion she has ego issues.
So what’s next Ms Inman Grant after you have fully ingratiated yourself with the global power elite? A spot on the WEF management board with your puppet masters or perhaps an upper management role with the CIA? Dare we speculate how high a 21st Century power woman can go?
Nelle's journey 