Date: May 20, 2025Author: cairnsnews 7 Comments
By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
|IT appears that a slim majority of voters on Sydney’s North Shore have fallen for billionaire Simon Holmes a Court’s grand deception that his “Community Independents” movement is some sort of alternative political movement.
A Court’s big lie is contained within his Climate200 organisation that proclaims “The fight to climate-proof Parliament continues”. The big lie is that if Australia goes all out on “green energy” it will somehow be “saving the planet from climate change”.
A Court and his businesses are invested to the eyeballs in so-called renewables, and a massive part of that is the easy money reaped from the Albanese government’s renewable wind and solar subsidies.
As noted by the Centre for Independent Studies: “The 2024-25 budget allocates more than $22 billion to boost renewables in Australia. This includes $13.7 billion in production tax incentives for green hydrogen and processed critical minerals as well as the $1.7 billion Future Made in Australia Innovation Fund aimed at developing new industries like green metals and low carbon fuels.”
Oh yes Mr A Court, we really do believe you have deep and sincere concern for the planet, which is why you spent millions of dollars funding first the Teals in the previous election, and now the “Community Independents” to ensure “the program” keeps on track.
And just in case our readers missed it, we’ll state the obvious again: Simon Holmes a Court’s Climate200 organisation is funding and using a fake political front groups to push the global green agenda, the very same agenda being pushed by the Albanese government and previous Coalition governments.
Holmes a Court very cleverly funded the green Teal ladies’ campaign in 2022 because he knew there was (and still is) a big chunk of Liberal Party voters who are Left-leaning feminists and “climate aware” aka, “sophisticated”, well-heeled urban folk, many of them women, who have swallowed the climate change/green-is-good narrative.
And as we know, these Teal ladies like Dr Monique Ryan from Melbourne or Zali Steggall from North Sydney, were basically Greens in high heels and professional business suits.
We might add that the great irony of this electorate is that it is named after the brilliant Australian engineer John Bradfield who oversaw the building of the Sydney Harbour Bridge and advocated for dam building.
We strongly suspect that, sadly, neither of the Bradfield candidates would support John Bradfield’s vision for Australia in the form of the Bradfield Scheme, and certainly not the billionaire greenie a Court, his other candidates and business cabal.
This time round however, slippery Simon added another touch: his Community Independents were out to challenge the “two party dominance”. Now where have we heard that line so many times, freedom fighters? Perhaps Clive Palmer and a few others could take a lesson here.
A Court targeted a specific demographic, a section of the population who have traditionally voted Liberal but have Left leanings and wouldn’t stoop to vote Green because they can see a little “red” in there.
The freedom parties are also targeting a section of the population who are disaffected with the political system. The difference is that a Court had a unified movement when the freedom parties were thoroughly fragmented.
In the North Sydney seat of Bradfield, a Court’s candidate Nicolette Boele looks to have won the seat from her Liberal “opponent” Gisele Kapterian. We question the opponent designation because she (like many Liberal women) and Boele basically believe in the same things.
Kapterian has all the “correct qualifications” for Liberal candidacy; corporate world high achiever who studied law at Cambridge under a Commonwealth Trust Scholarship, assisted in the case against Ethiopia for war crimes and completed an internship at the World Trade Organization, before working as an international trade lawyer in Geneva and London – a true globalist.
Cairns News election specialist Lex Stewart had some interesting observations about the Bradfield result.
“One of my observations of the close counts of the last 30 years is that it has almost always been the case that the result ends up against the Coalition. One would expect on the ‘law of averages’ that roughly half the time it would go one way, and half the time the other way.
“When I looked at the counting for Bradfield this morning it was 56,047 votes for the Liberal candidate and 55,997 votes for the Teal, who was therefore 50 votes behind the Lib in a total of 112,044 votes..
“Now TV9 news has a story about a “shock twist in the election race”.
“At 6.07pm on https://tallyroom.aec.gov.au/HouseDivisionPage-31496-108.htm it shows 56,192 for the Liberal and 56,231 for the Teal, a margin of the Teal over the Liberal of 39 votes, in a total of 112,423, plus about 6,417 informals.
“And so during today the AEC has counted an extra 379 votes, of which 234 or 62% went to the Teal, and only 145 or 38% for the Liberal. This large disparity 62 to 38 seems suspicious to me.Where did those extra 379 votes counted today come from?
“I see that the data for postal and absentee votes shows much larger numbers of votes for the Liberal than for the Teal, so you would expect that with a few more of this dribbling in that the balance would tip towards the Liberal candidate..
“Did the Liberals have good scrutineers in attendance during all of the counting, and at all polling booths on election night?!! I wonder if an AEC employee with an eraser altered a few pencil ballot papers?!
“Yes it did happen – refer to my attached submission to the Parliamentary review committee. But my submission was ignored, and its concerns were not mentioned in the committee’s report.”
Share Everywhere !
Shares
Nelle's journey 