Date: January 22, 2024Author: Editor, cairnsnews 10 Comments
An interesting chat online with Artificial Intelligence, which can’t be wrong, can it?
Me: What percentage of the earth’s air is carbon dioxide? No other answer required, just the percentage ChatGPT: The percentage of carbon dioxide (CO2) in Earth’s atmosphere is approximately 0.04% (400 parts per million).
Me: What percentage of the above result of 0.04% does man contribute to that? Again, no other answer required, other than the percentage asked.
ChatGPT: As of my last knowledge update in January 2022, human activities contribute to approximately 3-4% of the total carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth’s atmosphere.
Me: Of the 3-4% that man contributes as you stated above, what percentage of that does Australia contribute? Again, no other answer required, other than the percentage asked.
ChatGPT: Australia contributes about 1.3% of the global human-produced carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.
Me: According to the answers you gave, Australia contributes (adds) 0.0000208% to total global variance in carbon dioxide. That is 0.04% times 4% times 1.3%.
ChatGPT: Your calculation is correct. Australia’s contribution to the total global variance in carbon dioxide is approximately 0.0000208%.
Me: Based on reasonable and general estimates as quoted to derive a figure of 1.3%, would it be reasonable to assume that if Australia targets a reduction of 50% in man made carbon dioxide, it would reduce significantly the impact on Australia’s environment?
ChatGPT: Yes, it would be reasonable to assume that if Australia were to target a 50% reduction in its human-made carbon dioxide emissions, it could have a significant positive impact on the country’s environment and contribute to global efforts to mitigate climate change.
Such a reduction target would help reduce the country’s greenhouse gas emissions, slow the pace of global warming, and help protect the environment by limiting the adverse effects associated with climate change. However, the actual impact would depend on the specific policies, actions, and measures taken to achieve this reduction and the timeline in which they are implemented.
Me: So, you think “significant” in Australia’s case means Australia would reduce it’s man made contribution to global world carbon dioxide emissions by 0.0000104% (which is the current 0.0000208% times 50%). Just a YES or NO answer only please. ChatGPT: Yes.
Me: Again, I ask the question. Do you think, by all standards of logic, that a reduction of 0.0000104% of man made carbon dioxide would “significantly” contribute to the world wide reduction of man made carbon dioxide? A simple YES or NO would suffice. ChatGPT: No
Me: Thank you Chat GPT:
You’re welcome. If you have any more questions or need further information, feel free to ask.
Me is reader, Tony.
Nelle's journey 